[rfk-dev] Request For Comment: robotfindskitten standard

[Steve Pomeroy]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:30:00PM -0700, Peter A. H. Peterson wrote:
> But perhaps in order to be less pedantic and intimidating, many of the
> MUSTs should be changed to be SHOULDs or MAYs. It would obviously be a
> shame if anyone was put off from creating a port (even a "bad" one)
> because of the standard. For that matter, if people are put off by
> even the idea of an rfk standard, please speak up.

I greatly look forward to the day when my Android port can be RFK RFC
compliant.

-- 
Steve Pomeroy
http://staticfree.info/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://robotfindskitten.org/pipermail/rfk-dev/attachments/20090610/bc3c7a70/attachment.pgp