[rfk-dev] code status
Tim Allen
screwtape at froup.com
Fri Oct 14 06:30:02 CDT 2005
On 14 Oct 2005, at 19:37, Benjamin Molitor wrote:
> Would it be possible to maintain the NKI in messages.h and generate
> the files from that during the make process? Because maintaining
> two sets of NKI would probably not be the most elegat thing to do,
> eiter.
How about an approach where the binary contains a minimal set of NKIs
(if archives go back that far, perhaps 'the NKIs that came with the
first version of RFK', a sort of RFK-classic) but the POSIX port will
read external NKI sources as well - and have a policy that new NKIs
will always go into external files.
This would have the following benefits:
* Standalone RFK still works
* Standalone RFK isn't huge
* No worries about keeping the two message-lists is sync
* If anyone complains that the internal list of NKIs is too short,
there's an *artistic* reason why, rather than just 'the maintainer
said so'.
More information about the rfk-dev
mailing list