[rfk-dev] new package!

[Neale Pickett]

"Peter A. Peterson II" <pedro@tastytronic.net> writes:

> Quoting Neale Pickett:
>> I had a question though, I changed the version numbers and while Leonard
>> shot me a "looks good to me" I now fear I may have violated some
>> unspoken pact WRT RFK versioning.  It's not too late though--I haven't
>> uploaded the deb yet.  If the version number needs decreasing, please
>> lemme know ASAP.
>
> I thought the standard was that there was no standard for the first
> part of the version number, but that only the last portion was the
> number of packaged NKI.

Okay then, I'm standards-compliant at least.  :)

> Speaking of, what happened to the great and hilarious docs that were
> included in the rfk tarball? They've been replaced by boring, official
> looking and out of date ones.

Um, I'm not sure.  There were great and hilarious docs?  Which tarball?
I just packaged up what was in CVS.

Neale