[rfk-dev] new package!
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:08:45 -0800
"Peter A. Peterson II" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Quoting Neale Pickett:
>> I had a question though, I changed the version numbers and while Leonard
>> shot me a "looks good to me" I now fear I may have violated some
>> unspoken pact WRT RFK versioning. It's not too late though--I haven't
>> uploaded the deb yet. If the version number needs decreasing, please
>> lemme know ASAP.
> I thought the standard was that there was no standard for the first
> part of the version number, but that only the last portion was the
> number of packaged NKI.
Okay then, I'm standards-compliant at least. :)
> Speaking of, what happened to the great and hilarious docs that were
> included in the rfk tarball? They've been replaced by boring, official
> looking and out of date ones.
Um, I'm not sure. There were great and hilarious docs? Which tarball?
I just packaged up what was in CVS.