Thu, 31 May 2001 12:02:25 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On 24 May 2001, "Peter A. Peterson II" <email@example.com> wrote:
> * QUESTION: should the cgi patch just be included in the regular tree
> with instructions how to build it? Since it's such a different beast,
> I'm sort of tempted to create a robotfindskitten-CGI package that has
> the patch and instructions so that people looking for the cgi version
> can find it easily. It's so small that it should be included in the
> regular tree, anyway.
I think it should be in the regular tree. There's really no cost to
doing so. Also, don't ship the patch: just apply it to the tree, and
check that in to CVS.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----