[rfk-dev] updates...

[Martin Pool]

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 24 May 2001, "Peter A. Peterson II" <pedro@tastytronic.net> wrote:

> * QUESTION: should the cgi patch just be included in the regular tree
>   with instructions how to build it? Since it's such a different beast,
>   I'm sort of tempted to create a robotfindskitten-CGI package that has
>   the patch and instructions so that people looking for the cgi version
>   can find it easily. It's so small that it should be included in the
>   regular tree, anyway.

I think it should be in the regular tree.  There's really no cost to
doing so.  Also, don't ship the patch: just apply it to the tree, and
check that in to CVS.

--=20
Martin

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7FaYuPGPKP6Cz6IsRAhbaAJ0fiLO0w8tuufxzrxpK81EoqXWr0gCeK9rQ
NnphOi+TLrMkOUaI2jZuHo4=
=JF98
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--