[rfk-dev] updates...

Martin Pool mbp@valinux.com
Thu, 31 May 2001 12:02:25 +1000

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 24 May 2001, "Peter A. Peterson II" <pedro@tastytronic.net> wrote:

> * QUESTION: should the cgi patch just be included in the regular tree
>   with instructions how to build it? Since it's such a different beast,
>   I'm sort of tempted to create a robotfindskitten-CGI package that has
>   the patch and instructions so that people looking for the cgi version
>   can find it easily. It's so small that it should be included in the
>   regular tree, anyway.

I think it should be in the regular tree.  There's really no cost to
doing so.  Also, don't ship the patch: just apply it to the tree, and
check that in to CVS.


Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org