[rfk-dev] bugs

[David Griffith]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Eric S. Raymond wrote:

> Peter A. H. Peterson <pedro at tastytronic.net>:
>> What do people think about having a release version number -- the
>> X.YYYY number -- which is relevant for releases, packages, etc., but
>> at runtime the version number in the status area displays a dynamic
>> count of the NKIs loaded at startup?
>>
>> That way, the version number from the perspective of the build tools
>> is separate from the more whimsical tertiary NKI count.
>
> I'd be opposed to this change.

Somewhat sideways from this is the seven digits in the minor portion of 
the version number.  Could we stick with two or three?


-- 
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu

A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?