[rfk-dev] bugs

David Griffith dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
Sun Oct 28 14:34:55 PDT 2012

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Eric S. Raymond wrote:

> Peter A. H. Peterson <pedro at tastytronic.net>:
>> What do people think about having a release version number -- the
>> X.YYYY number -- which is relevant for releases, packages, etc., but
>> at runtime the version number in the status area displays a dynamic
>> count of the NKIs loaded at startup?
>> That way, the version number from the perspective of the build tools
>> is separate from the more whimsical tertiary NKI count.
> I'd be opposed to this change.

Somewhat sideways from this is the seven digits in the minor portion of 
the version number.  Could we stick with two or three?

David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu

A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

More information about the rfk-dev mailing list