[rfk-dev] Preferred patch submission process?

[David Griffith]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Peter A. H. Peterson wrote:

> Quoting David Griffith:
>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Peter A. H. Peterson wrote:
>>> Quoting David Wolever:
>>>> Awesome. With that, valgrind reports no more invalid memory
>>>> accesses? And with
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/rfk/git/merge-requests/6/ we won't even
>>>> leak memory!
>>>
>>> ... should be merged now.
>>
>> Looks like these changes did the trick.  I'm running rfk on a 32-bit
>> machine without trouble.
>
> Excellent!
>
> With that, I think we should do a pretty solid round of playtesting to
> make sure that we have uncovered/fixed all the bugs in the new code. I
> suspect there are more to be fixed.

Here's one: when robot finds kitten and the animation plays, robot and 
kitten in the playfield both disappear.  That's a bit jarring.

-- 
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu

A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?