[rfk-dev] BUG(?): rfk should ignore temp files in nki directories

Eric S. Raymond esr at thyrsus.com
Tue Nov 6 14:07:07 PST 2012

Steve Pomeroy <steve at staticfree.info>:
> On 2012-11-06 15:04, Peter A. H. Peterson wrote:
> > What do you guys think? Currently, rfk will source a file like
> > "vanilla.nki~" ... is this desired behavior? I would think not.
> > 
> > I suggest only files that end in ".nki" should be sourced. Are there
> > other tempfile formats we should avoid? I also did not test whether
> > hidden files are sourced. 
> My vote is to only source .nki. That makes things more flexible (you can
> have other files in the same dir) while losing near no functionality.

		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://robotfindskitten.org/pipermail/rfk-dev/attachments/20121106/f91d80be/attachment.pgp 

More information about the rfk-dev mailing list